I am… a Gleek

In which I write about a television series on a writing blog.  However I am trying to keep this series of I am… Essays on this blog so here you have it.

GleeksSeveral years ago, when Glee came out, I was pretty skeptical.  It seems to be a little out there and odd and kind of dorky.  I mean it’s basically a musical TV series.  Sort of like American Idol with a plot.

I passed on it.  it was “lame”.

The problem is, I like music.  I also have a weakness for cover songs.  I have a weakness for cover songs that change the style of the music.  Most importantly.  I like things that are lame.

Suddenly, one day, Glee showed up on Netflix.  Season One anyway.  So hey, this is popular, let’s see what’s what with Glee.  And I was hooked.  The whole series was basically a series of cover songs of older music with a lose plot used to tie the songs together by lyrical themes.  The cast is actually full of fairly annoying and unlikable characters but at the same time, I can’t help but hang on to their every plight.

What really helps the series is that the cast members can actually sing music.  Hell part of the reason the entire cast is basically a bunch of nobodies is that they went out and found people off Broadway or wherever who could actually perform.

After the first season climaxed at the Sectionals competition, cleverly throwing back to the Journey song that brought the group together, Don’t Stop Believin’, I wanted more.  I didn’t want it to stop.  Sadly, Netflix had no Season 2.  Occasionally I scooped up shows through Amazon when they would have promos for free video credit but I only managed to get a third of the way through.

Fortunately, Netflix caught up and Season 2 arrived.  The series started taking new turns.  The music became more up to date, which actually kind of hurts the series’ charm.  The A Cappella group the Warblers was introduced and got many opportunities to show off throughout the season.  More interestingly, several characters who in Season One were essentially furniture started to get pushed up into the spotlight.  The core cast grew naturally as the original stars had been somewhat exhausted.  The originals didn’t fall away at all, they just got a bit less screen time.

On a side note, the one character I’d like to know more about who has literally been referred to as furniture on the show has still never got anything, which is the ever present pianist.  Who the hell is that guy anyway and why is he always hanging around?

Anyway, Season 2 got grander with it’s competitions and drama.  It also made several interesting choices which really stood out during the competitions.  During the Sectionals performance, the standard duo of Rachel and Finn are pushed aside for Quinn and Sam, but the camera work and staging is paralleled to the previous Sectionals of Rachel and Finn.  (On a side note, I really wish Rachel had done this song because she would have kicked ass at it).

Even more clever was the Nationals duet finale with Rachel  and Finn which does directly parallel the previous season finale except for the crucial difference that instead of accepting their love for each other there is a bit of animosity and even hatred at work.

Speaking of Rachel.  Never have i been so torn on a character.  Rachel Berry is the extremely self centered star performer of the group.  She thinks she is “all the shit” when it comes to the club, which isn’t helped by the fact that she is right.  This makes her extremely unlikable.  On the other hand, she is so legitimately ridiculously talented that I could listen to her sing all day.  It almost makes me want to cry at some points.  Not every song is a winner but there are a lot of really brilliant songs done by Rachel.

Which brings up my last little point I’d like to touch on.  There is this impending dilemma for the end of Season Three.  The creators have decided that it doesn’t work to keep the characters perpetually in High School.  The actors age out.  They also may want to explore other roles (or even singing careers).  It also gives the excuse for the writers to dump characters when their pay grade starts to spike.  This creates “The Graduation Delima”.  Officially, only Kurt, Finn and Rachel are leaving (supposedly/apparently).  In watching Season Three, it feels like almost all of the main cast is in their Senior Year.  Once they graduate, what happens? 

They could continue with the show, get some new “kids” and keep going.  The problem I see here is that so far, despite getting more characterization, Kurt, Finn and Rachel are the most important characters in the series.  Quinn and Santana are ok, but a lot of the others are are pretty one dimensional despite.

There also could be an entirely different possibility of following the cast as they move on.  There is a lot of push that could land a lot of the main characters in New York.  Even if they rebrand the show ‘”Broadway” and move on, that could almost work.

Probably the best option, frankly, is to just end it.

Yeah, I like the show.  I like it a lot.  I watch repeats of the songs on Youtube and have a dozen or so MP3s of the tracks, but it may be time to just end it.  I have gotten irritated at series endings in the past but I have seen many others just linger for way too long. 

The best example I can think of is House, which should have also ended at Season 3.  House fires his staff and ends up alone like he wants.  No lame reality show style contest, no dumb prison junk or House goes crazy crazy, just an end.  I used to really like House but the plots got so drama filled and outlandish and there are so many times House can misdiagnose things until he gets an epiphany before it gets old.

So my vote, despite my Gleekdom, is for Glee to end.  Push them to a win at Nationals, give us the series climax we all want, and let ti quietly ride off on a huge bang.

So I recently, somewhat out of boredom, decided to play a little Grand theft Auto: San Andreas.  I haven’t played any GTAS games in a while though back when they were newer, I was something of an expert on them, especially so for GTA3.  I’m not making it up when I say I have beaten GTA3 and Vice City 100% without dying, being arrested, or “saving and continuing”.  I can speed through these cities and pick out the shortest route from any point to any point, I knew where hidden health and ammo was when needed,   Basically, I really enjoyed the series and played it a lot.  I’ve been playing GTA games since GTA1 was new, and when I first played the game ‘Midtown Madness”, the first game I know of with a free form sandbox driving mode, I instantly knew that “If they combined this with GTA, it would be the greatest game ever”.  Then they did it and it was amazing.

Fast forward to now.  My primary gaming habits have shifted from spending 100+ hours on multiple games each (GTA3, Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, etc) to short bursts of maybe 2 hours a week, mostly on the DS.  I play slow paced games I can drop and come back to like Professor Layton or Scribblenauts.  The idea of playing anything that takes more than 20 hours to complete is staggeringly out of reach.  This comes from job and kids and wife of course, not a complaint but just a point.  When I was rolling over 200 hours in Final Fantasy X, I was in college with more or less “nothing to do” for 90% of my day.

I didn’t expect to finish San Andreas by any means.  I started fresh from the beginning of the game, mostly because I failed to insert my GTA:SA memory card in the PS2, and decided to refresh myself on the story.  Most of my game time was spent thinking “Man there’s a lot of pointless swearing in this game”.

And that’s when I knew I was a prudish old person.  But am I really?  While, for the sake of the kids, I have severely curbed my swearing in daily use, I don’t really have a problem with the concept of swearing.  I’m starting to think that part of my issue wasn’t with the constant stream of foul language being imitated on screen, it was the ineloquence of it.  It was the fact that the swearing wasn’t being done in any level of thoughtful fashion, nor was it interspersed with other “colorful metaphors”.  It was just there for some sort of pointless shock value.  It’s like the writers just threw in as many “fucks” and “shits” in as they could for the hell of it.

This of course works for the target audience of 18-24 year olds.  Anyone younger, hopefully isn’t playing.  Anyone older will likely just be turned off by it.  Not that I’m too disappointed.  Whole San Andreas is expansive in it’s scope and region, memory tells me the story more or less falls to pieces at the start of Act 2.  CJ, the hero goes from being a believable gangsta to some sort of soft ball wanna be rich kid street racer punk.  By the time this poor kid from the hood owns an airport and starts raiding Area 51 for Jet Packs you can pretty much be assured that the story has gone way off it’s tracks.

While I’d hate to turn this into some sort of san Andreas review, I’ve always gotten the impression that the Los Santos portions of the game was the true game but someone came along and said “hey, let’s break things out in the middle and add these San Francisco and Vegas themed areas.  I say this mostly because if you flat out cut out all portions of the story not based around the Grove Street gang and los Santos, you actually get a pretty decent story of betrayal and street gang life.